Difference between revisions of "Category:Contradictions"

For those who believe in the supernatural literal inspiration of the Bible, this is a huge problem. Here are four different allegedly eyewitness accounts of the same event. Each of them recorded the details of this event. Each of them is supernaturally inspired by God to record this event. The event is the central point of human history. Even if a shoe horn is used to fit the apparently contradictory passages together, then why are God's reporters so really bad at details. Which one was the real writing on Jesus cross. Four testaments, four different set of words. No eyewitness precision at all:

Mat. 27:37 And set up over his head his accusation written, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Mar. 15:26 And the superscription of his accusation was written over, THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Luk. 23-38 And a superscription also was written over him in letters of Greek, and Latin, and Hebrew, THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Jhn. 19:19 And Pilate wrote a title, and put [it] on the cross. And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Suppose it's not like Luke says, that it was written in Greek (why Greek?), Latin and Hebrew (aramaic?). Also suppose that Pilate didn't write the title himself, like John suggests. Still we have no coincidence, and the four originals in Greek bear the same literal differences. The inscription was written, everybody saw it. If we talk about eyewitness, such mistake among four sources (two of them clearly collusions) is not acceptable.