Category talk:Contradictions

From Errancy Wiki
Revision as of 04:31, 24 November 2005 by JustinEiler (talk | contribs) (→‎Moved Crucifixion discussion: - Response)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Moved Crucifixion discussion

An anonymous poster made an argument for errancy based on the four differing accounts of the Crucifixion titulus: that argument was moved to a new page: Crucifixion:_Four_Different_Accounts.

Whoever is planning on making a comment about contradictions, make sure that you know your history and read the entire chapter of wherever the verse comes from. I can't stand it when people take things out of context, it just confuses everybody. Thank you for your cooperation.

That's what this Wiki is all about. If you see a weak argument for errancy, feel free to expose it for the weak argument that it is. --JustinEiler 22:31, 23 Nov 2005 (CST)