Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Errancy Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Fixed typo)
(Link To Legends Page)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
It's easier to find items with comments by looking in the categories than by browsing the books of the Bible.  Please see [[Special:Recentchanges|Recent Changes]] to check on what we've been talking about lately.
 
It's easier to find items with comments by looking in the categories than by browsing the books of the Bible.  Please see [[Special:Recentchanges|Recent Changes]] to check on what we've been talking about lately.
 +
 +
'''We have a new [http://www.errancywiki.com/index.php?title=Legends&rcid=41896 Legends Page] featuring ''Luke vs. Matthew on the Year of Christ's Birth'' By Richard Carrier (2006)
 +
'''
  
 
<table border="0"><tr><td valign="top">
 
<table border="0"><tr><td valign="top">

Revision as of 14:44, 19 June 2006

Featured Pro Piece
1 Chronicles 3:19
Featured Smackdown
Matthew 1:7
Featured Con Piece
Job 1:7

Errancy Wiki is the one and only wiki-style site for arguments about errors in the Bible.

Categories of claimed error: Contradictions - Science - History - Immorality - Other. Discussions are generally divided into Pro, Con, or Neutral arguments.

It's easier to find items with comments by looking in the categories than by browsing the books of the Bible. Please see Recent Changes to check on what we've been talking about lately.

We have a new Legends Page featuring Luke vs. Matthew on the Year of Christ's Birth By Richard Carrier (2006)

Hebrew Bible

New Testament

Deuterocanon

News

Please welcome Robert Stevens as an admin. For now, therefore, we are operating on a "three wise men" system. I welcome the application of any Christian as the fourth admin. If you're interested, leave a comment on my Talk page with a statement of intent.

Rules

  1. Critique is okay, but there must be no insults, either to persons or to ideas. The tone should be academic, even witty, but not acerbic.
  2. Dual point of view is maintained. If you support a particular item as error, edit only in "Pro" or "Neutral." If you oppose a particular item as error, edit only in "Con" or "Neutral." Admins, however, are trusted enough to make changes in either section without undermining actual arguments made.
  3. If there is any voting, you must register a name first and declare whether you are primarily "Pro" or "Con" as an editor on your user page.
  4. First violation of these rules results in a warning. Second incident results in a 24-hour ban. The third results in a 7-day ban. The fourth results in a hard ban, which can be lifted only on the agreement of all admins.
  5. No spam. Any outbound link will be deleted, with a rare exception made for specific online supporting documentation. The first violation will result in a hard ban, which can be lifted only on the agreement of all admins.

Roadmap

The roadmap has been adjusted.

  • January 1, 2006. At least 100 "Pro" sections will be edited. 58 as of November 2, 2005 ~ 124 as of January 16, 2006
  • July 1, 2006. At least 100 "Con" sections will be edited. 24 as of November 2, 2005 ~ 32 as of January 16, 2006
  • November 1, 2006. At least 50 users will sign up. 44 as of November 2, 2005 ~ 50 as of January 16, 2006
  • January 1, 2007. At least 100 verse pages will be greater than 5000 bytes.
  • April 1, 2007. At least 250 "Pro" sections will be edited.
  • July 1, 2007. At least 250 "Con" sections will be edited.
  • November 1, 2007. At least 250 verse pages will be greater than 5000 bytes.
  • January 1, 2008. At least 100,000 250,000 1,000,000 page views will be reached. Already over 200k. Let's aim higher!
  • January 1, 2009. At least 10,000 verse pages will be edited.